The first bomb fell on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki
Jan 30, 2024 7:33:01 GMT
Post by account_disabled on Jan 30, 2024 7:33:01 GMT
Resulting in a total of 220,000 deaths. Our perplexity came from evaluating that the measure of using the two atomic bombs on peaceful cities in Japan, although effective in forcing the Japanese surrender, was disproportionate as it constituted an abusive sacrifice of thousands of innocent civilian lives. At that time, American politics lacked what is known today in the legal world as "correct weighing judgment . " This judgment involves carefully weighing conflicting rights or interests in light of human values and principles, and allows for measures that do not disproportionately sacrifice the rights of others. Totalitarianisms Unfortunately, in the case of atomic bombs, a serious injury was caused to the conscience of humanity through the massive destruction of human beings, which left a scar in history and gave rise to the dangerous nuclear race that still exists today.
lurks Self-blame In the processes of discursive influence , guilt has been examined as a mode of persuasive influence for a manipulated subject to carry out, avoid or abandon an action, through a reproach based on a moral Phone Number Database status. This type of influence is usually directed towards others, but can also be directed towards oneself through a movement of self-blame . It is precisely this type of influence that torments Oppenheimer and leads him to visit President Truman to persuade him to moderate the use of atomic weapons. Truman, visibly upset with Openheimer's attitude, reacts contemptuously and says that he never wants to see “this bastard” again . Now, it seems that politics despises science, making evident the fourth logic of wars: their utilitarian character.
With the atomic bombs, a serious injury was caused to the conscience of humanity through the massive destruction of human beings, which left a scar in history. Oppenheimer's stance, along with his opposition to the development of the hydrogen bomb, left him vulnerable to the new postwar dynamics. In this scenario, the third antisubject of the story told in the film emerges, colleague Lewis Strauss , who had the intention of neutralizing and destroying Oppenheimer's power of influence in American society, motivated by Einstein's apparent disdain for him and whose cause he blamed on Oppenheimer. Strauss consequently executes a narrative program of revenge in 1954, sponsoring a twisted government security hearing that violates all procedural guarantees of modern law.
lurks Self-blame In the processes of discursive influence , guilt has been examined as a mode of persuasive influence for a manipulated subject to carry out, avoid or abandon an action, through a reproach based on a moral Phone Number Database status. This type of influence is usually directed towards others, but can also be directed towards oneself through a movement of self-blame . It is precisely this type of influence that torments Oppenheimer and leads him to visit President Truman to persuade him to moderate the use of atomic weapons. Truman, visibly upset with Openheimer's attitude, reacts contemptuously and says that he never wants to see “this bastard” again . Now, it seems that politics despises science, making evident the fourth logic of wars: their utilitarian character.
With the atomic bombs, a serious injury was caused to the conscience of humanity through the massive destruction of human beings, which left a scar in history. Oppenheimer's stance, along with his opposition to the development of the hydrogen bomb, left him vulnerable to the new postwar dynamics. In this scenario, the third antisubject of the story told in the film emerges, colleague Lewis Strauss , who had the intention of neutralizing and destroying Oppenheimer's power of influence in American society, motivated by Einstein's apparent disdain for him and whose cause he blamed on Oppenheimer. Strauss consequently executes a narrative program of revenge in 1954, sponsoring a twisted government security hearing that violates all procedural guarantees of modern law.